ACLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -308.4% compared to Arcellx's net margin of -49.65%. Arcellx's return on equity of -22.3% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Arcellx has a consensus price target of $115.40, signalling upside risk potential of 115.3%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 79.7%. Given that Arcellx has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Arcellx is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Arcellx has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.271%.

Arcellx has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcellx pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arcellx quarterly revenues are $15.3M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Arcellx's net income of -$47.1M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Arcellx's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcellx is 26.60x versus 0.13x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of -308.4% compared to Arcellx's net margin of --. Arcellx's return on equity of -22.3% beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

Arcellx has a consensus price target of $115.40, signalling upside risk potential of 115.3%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 461.48%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Arcellx, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Arcellx.

Arcellx has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.16%.

Arcellx has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcellx pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arcellx quarterly revenues are $15.3M, which are larger than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. Arcellx's net income of -$47.1M is lower than Oragenics's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Arcellx's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcellx is 26.60x versus 1.11x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -308.4% compared to Arcellx's net margin of -2357.27%. Arcellx's return on equity of -22.3% beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Arcellx has a consensus price target of $115.40, signalling upside risk potential of 115.3%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1484.07%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Arcellx, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Arcellx.

Arcellx has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.45%.

Arcellx has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcellx pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arcellx quarterly revenues are $15.3M, which are larger than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Arcellx's net income of -$47.1M is lower than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Arcellx's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcellx is 26.60x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -308.4% compared to Arcellx's net margin of --. Arcellx's return on equity of -22.3% beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Arcellx has a consensus price target of $115.40, signalling upside risk potential of 115.3%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 466.04%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Arcellx, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Arcellx.

Arcellx has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.169, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.92%.

Arcellx has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcellx pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arcellx quarterly revenues are $15.3M, which are larger than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Arcellx's net income of -$47.1M is lower than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Arcellx's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcellx is 26.60x versus 0.63x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.